> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details
|
Message Content Inventory |
Identifier : EPTY002 - Echange contextuel, données producteur - (Numéro compte producteur)-
- Approved
, and is part of release 201901
- ( UN/Edifact : added info ) - (UN/Edifact MIG : Fr / Nl ) - (XML/JSON : added info ) |
Sender : Any
Receiver : Any
Status : 2 - Version : 2
|
Seq. n° | n u d (*) |
Data element | Code list |
Usage Mandatory Conditional Optional (**) |
Condition(s) |
||
Indicator |
Identifier |
Version |
|||||
10 |
Contrat
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
20 |
Intermédiaire - Intermédiaire
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
30 | u |
Intermédiaire - Numéro FSMA
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
Since 15/7/2017 the FSMA no longer attributes such number
|
40 | u |
Intermédiaire - Identifiant de l'intermédiaire aupres de la compagnie (numéro de compte producteur)
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
|
41 | n |
Intermédiaire - Numéro d'entreprise
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
Added as FSMA-broker-id abandoned 15/7/2017
|
42 | n |
Intermédiaire - Numéro unité d'exploitation
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
Added as FSMA-broker-id abandoned 15/7/2017
|
43 | n |
Intermédiaire - LEI
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
Added as FSMA-broker-id abandoned 15/7/2017
|
50 |
Contrat - indication fin dossier
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.
(*bis) u : updated : this can be a codelist-version incrementing.
Note that in many, not to say all such cases, the user-community does not await such next release to implement/activate such new codelist-values.
The reasoning is that such added value does not affect the current data-structures and hence is considered easely implementable.
Such reasoning tends to forget how given new codelist-values might not simply affect the data, but also affect the process, which might be more of a problem...
(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.
Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard.
And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used".
Ideally we should implement the same ideas.