> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details > Representations

SYNTAX INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS

Implementation Related Components


Message Content Inventory Archived, and was part of release 200901 :
Identifier : M9730 - Objet technique, document annexé / Technisch object, bijgevoegd document - (Messages with added documents - Multimedia JPEG, TIF, PDF) - ( TB2-XML/JSON MIG : Fr/Nl are under construction... ) - (UN/Edifact & XML/JSON : added info )
Sender : Any
Receiver : Any
Status : 3 - Version : 1
Seq. n° n
u
d
(*)
Data element
Code list
Usage
Mandatory
Conditional
Optional (**)
Condition(s)
TB2 XML and JSON representation (***)
Indicator
Identifier
Version
10  
Message issuing date and time
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ExchangeUnitIssueDateTime 
11 n 
Message content inventory identifier
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ExchangeUnitBusinessContentDescription 
12 n 
Message content inventory version
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ExchangeUnitBusinessContentDescriptionVersion 
20  
GUID (Globally Unique IDentifier) du message référencé
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ReferencedMessageGuidReference 
30  
Document annexé
No
-
-
Mand.
 
Document... 
40  
Indication présence Multimédia
Yes
1
Mand.
 
MultimediaFileIsPresentProcesscode 
50  
MultiMediaData fichier : Composite element : Filetype, Filename, Stringbase, Stringlength, String
No
-
-
Mand.
 
...Datafile MultimediaDetail MultimediafileName MIMElikeContentTransferEncoding DatastringLength Datastring 

(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.

(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
  example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.

Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard. And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used". Ideally we should implement the same ideas.

(***) Remark: In 2020 things evolved into another "approach A" and then yet another "approach B" - It is that "appoach B" which you see here - That "approach B" is the basis of the EDIMERX development.
In TB2-XML "Namespace 2018" (as well as in eEG7-UN/CEFACT), things were/are structurally different.
EDIMERX is supporting the transition from Edifact (messages) to JSON (API's).
The so-called "Business API's" are what comes next / after such transition-phase - and there things will be structurally differrent again.