> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details > Representations

SYNTAX INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS

Implementation Related Components


Message Content Inventory Identifier : M0902 - Prévention fraude, renvoi R.S.R. / Fraudepreventie, terugsturen R.S.R. - (As in Community MIG's - Datassur - RSR : Renvoi par Datassur / Terugzending door Datassur) - Approved , and is part of release 2005pre
- (UN/Edifact & XML/JSON : added info )
Sender : Datassur
Receiver : Insurer
Status : 2 - Version : 1
Seq. n° n
u
d
(*)
Data element
Code list
Usage
Mandatory
Conditional
Optional (**)
Condition(s)
TB2 XML and JSON representation (***)
Indicator
Identifier
Version
10  
Message about fraud prevention
No
-
-
Mand.
 
 
20  
Message about fraud prevention - RSR return
No
-
-
Mand.
 
 
30  
Message domain
No
-
-
Mand.
this message id domain independent 
Domain 
40  
Message issuing date and time
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ExchangeUnitIssueDateTime 
50  
Message content inventory identifier
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ExchangeUnitBusinessContentDescription 
60  
Message content inventory version
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ExchangeUnitBusinessContentDescriptionVersion 
70  
Code release RSR
Yes
0
Mand.
 
RsrReleaseProcesscode 
80  
Type de transaction RSR
Yes
1
Mand.
 
RsrTransactionProcesscode 
90  
Code erreur
No
-
-
Mand.
Note - D011 is not yet a Telebib2 coded list 
ErrorProcesscode 
100  
Branche
Yes
1
Mand.
 
BranchProductcode ProductDetail ProductIdentifier 
110  
Sous-branche
Yes
1
Mand.
 
SubBranchProductcode ProductDetail ProductIdentifier 
120  
Moment de l'événement
No
-
-
Mand.
 
MomentOfTheEventDateTime 
130  
Date de constation des faits
No
-
-
Mand.
 
FactsEstablishmentDate 
140  
Date enregistrement par Datassur
No
-
-
Mand.
 
DatassurRegistrationDate 
150  
Numéro de la fiche Datassur
No
-
-
Mand.
 
DatassurRecordReference 
160  
Motif d'enregistrement
Yes
1
Mand.
 
ReasonForRegistrationCode 
170  
Tranche de montant
Yes
1
Mand.
 
AmountBracketCode 
180  
Adresse douteuse
No
-
-
Mand.
 
DatassurRegistrationAddressCodeProbablyIncorrectBinary 
190  
Il y a-t-il contestation de la fiche RSR
No
-
-
Mand.
 
DatassurRegistrationDisputeBinary 
200  
Total des indemnités
No
-
-
Mand.
 
TotalBenefitsAmount 
210  
Nombre de sinistres
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ClaimsQuantity 
220  
Nombre de sinstres responsables
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ClaimsAtFaultQuantity 
230  
Preneur
No
-
-
Mand.
 
PartyMainPolicyHolder 
240  
Preneur - Nom officiel
No
-
-
Mand.
 
OfficialName NameDetail LastName FirstName 
250  
Preneur - Adresse
No
-
-
Mand.
 
OfficialAddress AddressDetail StreetName 
260  
Preneur - Date de naissance
No
-
-
Option.
 
BirthDate 
270  
Preneur - Numéro TVA
No
-
-
Option.
 
VatReference 
280  
Preneur - Personne physique ou morale
Yes
1
Mand.
 
NaturalOrLegalPersonCode 
290 u 
Preneur - Langue
Yes
3
Mand.
 
LanguageCode 
300  
Preneur - Sexe
Yes
1
Mand.
 
GenderCode 
310  
Preneur - Statut juridique
Yes
1
Mand.
 
LegalFormCode 
320  
Preneur - Qualité de la personne dans le dossier
Yes
2
Mand.
 
CapacityOfThePartyInTheFileCode 
330  
Assureur
No
-
-
Mand.
 
PartyInsurer 
340  
Assureur - Numéro FSMA
No
-
-
Mand.
formerly named UPEA/BVVO / OCA/CDV -number 
PartyIdentificationDetail PartyIdentifier CodeListIdentifier 
350  
Assureur - Numéro du dossier
No
-
-
Mand.
 
FileReference 
360  
Assureur - Numéro de la fiche Datassur
No
-
-
Mand.
 
DatassurRecordReference 
370  
Objet de risque
No
-
-
Option.
 
ObjectInsuredUndefinedObject 
380  
Objet de risque - Situation du risque
No
-
-
Mand.
 
RiskAddress 
390  
Message end
No
-
-
Mand.
 
 

(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.

(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
  example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.

Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard. And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used". Ideally we should implement the same ideas.

(***) Remark: In 2020 things evolved into another "approach A" and then yet another "approach B" - It is that "appoach B" which you see here - That "approach B" is the basis of the EDIMERX development.
In TB2-XML "Namespace 2018" (as well as in eEG7-UN/CEFACT), things were/are structurally different.
EDIMERX is supporting the transition from Edifact (messages) to JSON (API's).
The so-called "Business API's" are what comes next / after such transition-phase - and there things will be structurally differrent again.