SYNTAX INDEPENDENT
COMPONENTS
Implementation Related Components
SYNTAX INDEPENDENT
COMPONENTS |
|
| Message Content Inventory |
Archived, and was part of release 200601 : Identifier : M0401 - Demande, liste de polices / Vraag, lijst polissen - (Demande de relevé de portefeuille / Aanvraag van een portefeuille-overzicht) - ( TB2-XML/JSON MIG : Fr/Nl are under construction... ) - (UN/Edifact & XML/JSON : added info ) |
Sender : Broker
Receiver : Insurer
Status : 3 - Version : 1
|
| Seq. n° | n u d (*) |
Data element | Code list |
Usage Mandatory Conditional Optional (**) |
Condition(s) |
TB2 XML and JSON representation (***) |
||
Indicator |
Identifier |
Version |
||||||
| 10 |
Type de police
|
Yes
|
4
|
Option.
|
PolicyProductcode
|
|||
| 15 |
Numéro de police
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
PolicyReference
|
||
| 19 |
Assureur
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
PartyInsurer
|
||
| 20 |
Assureur - Numéro CBFA
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
PartyIdentificationDetail PartyIdentifier CodeListIdentifier
|
||
| 24 |
Intermédiaire
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
PartyIntermediary
|
||
| 25 |
Intermédiaire - Numéro CBFA
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
PartyIdentificationDetail PartyIdentifier CodeListIdentifier
|
||
| 30 |
Intermédiaire - Identifiant de l'intermédiaire aupres de la compagnie
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
PartyIdentificationDetail PartyIdentifier CodeListIdentifier
|
||
(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.
(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.
Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard. And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used". Ideally we should implement the same ideas.
(***) Remark: In 2020 things evolved into another "approach A" and then yet another "approach B" - It is that "appoach B" which you see here - That "approach B" is the basis of the EDIMERX development.
In TB2-XML "Namespace 2018" (as well as in eEG7-UN/CEFACT), things were/are structurally different.
EDIMERX is supporting the transition from Edifact (messages) to JSON (API's).
The so-called "Business API's" are what comes next / after such transition-phase - and there things will be structurally differrent again.