> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details > Representations

SYNTAX INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS

Implementation Related Components


Message Content Inventory Archived, and was part of release 201301 :
Identifier : M0126 - Contrat, message production origine assureur hors contrat - (MPB : Message Production, mais hors contrat / Productie Bericht, maar los van bestaand contract) - ( TB2-XML/JSON MIG : Fr/Nl are under construction... ) - (UN/Edifact & XML/JSON : added info )
Sender : Insurer
Receiver : Broker
Status : 3 - Version : 2
Seq. n° n
u
d
(*)
Data element
Code list
Usage
Mandatory
Conditional
Optional (**)
Condition(s)
TB2 XML and JSON representation (***)
Indicator
Identifier
Version
10  
Message issuing date and time
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ExchangeUnitIssueDateTime 
20  
Message content inventory identifier
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ExchangeUnitBusinessContentDescription 
30 u 
Message content inventory version
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ExchangeUnitBusinessContentDescriptionVersion 
40  
Contrat
No
-
-
Mand.
 
 
50  
Type de police
Yes
7
Option.
 
PolicyProductcode 
60  
Produit
No
-
-
Option.
 
ProductNameProductcode ProductDetail ProductIdentifier CodeListResponsibleAgencyCoded ProductName 
70  
Date d'effet
No
-
-
Mand.
 
InceptionDate 
80  
GUID (Globally Unique IDentifier) du message, sera référencé par le(s) document(s) annexe(s)
No
-
-
Cond.
Mandatory when added documents are sent. 
MessageGuidReference 
90  
Référence des paiements
No
-
-
Option.
 
PaymentReference 
100  
Nombre de documents annexes
No
-
-
Cond.
Mandatory when added documents are sent. 
DocumentsAttachedQuantity 
110  
Acte de gestion
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ActionRating 
120 u 
Acte de gestion - Code MPB origine assureur (texte libre)
Yes
3
Cond.
Mandatory when text is present 
CodeMpbOriginInsuranceCompanyCode 
130  
Acte de gestion - Texte de communication
No
-
-
Option.
 
CommunicationText 
140  
Assureur
No
-
-
Mand.
 
PartyInsurer 
150  
Assureur - Numéro CBFA
No
-
-
Mand.
 
PartyIdentificationDetail PartyIdentifier CodeListIdentifier 
160  
Assureur - Type d'assureur en coassurance
Yes
1
Option.
 
InsurerInCaseOfCoInsuranceCode 
170  
Assureur - Correspondant - Correspondant, gestionnaire
No
-
-
Option.
 
RelatedCorrespondentOrManager 
180  
Assureur - Correspondant - Nom officiel
No
-
-
Mand.
 
OfficialName 
190  
Assureur - Correspondant - Numéro de téléphone bureau
No
-
-
Option.
 
OfficeTelephoneCommID 
200  
Assureur - Correspondant - Numéro de fax
No
-
-
Option.
 
FaxCommID 
210  
Assureur - Correspondant - e-Mail
No
-
-
Mand.
 
EmailAddressCommID 
220  
Intermédiaire
No
-
-
Mand.
 
PartyIntermediary 
230  
Intermédiaire - Numéro CBFA
No
-
-
Option.
 
PartyIdentificationDetail PartyIdentifier CodeListIdentifier 
240  
Intermédiaire - Identifiant de l'intermédiaire aupres de la compagnie
No
-
-
Mand.
 
PartyIdentificationDetail PartyIdentifier CodeListIdentifier 
250  
Intermédiaire - Numéro du dossier
No
-
-
Option.
 
FileReference 
260  
Intermédiaire - Correspondant
No
-
-
Option.
 
RelatedCorrespondentOrManager 
270  
Intermédiaire - Correspondant - Nom officiel
No
-
-
Mand.
 
OfficialName 
280  
Intermédiaire - Correspondant - Numéro de téléphone bureau
No
-
-
Option.
 
OfficeTelephoneCommID 
290  
Intermédiaire - Correspondant - Numéro de fax
No
-
-
Option.
 
FaxCommID 
300  
Intermédiaire - Correspondant - e-Mail
No
-
-
Option.
 
EmailAddressCommID 
310 u 
Preneur d'assurance
No
-
-
Option.
one of PTY003GRPv5- PTY003PMv5- PTY003PPv6 
PartyMainPolicyHolder 
320  
Objet de risque
No
-
-
Option.
0..n presencies 
ObjectInsured... 

(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.

(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
  example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.

Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard. And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used". Ideally we should implement the same ideas.

(***) Remark: In 2020 things evolved into another "approach A" and then yet another "approach B" - It is that "appoach B" which you see here - That "approach B" is the basis of the EDIMERX development.
In TB2-XML "Namespace 2018" (as well as in eEG7-UN/CEFACT), things were/are structurally different.
EDIMERX is supporting the transition from Edifact (messages) to JSON (API's).
The so-called "Business API's" are what comes next / after such transition-phase - and there things will be structurally differrent again.