Message Content Inventory |
Identifier : IxD6xx - - (Données spécifiques (sous-)garanties A.T.)
- Approved
, and is part of release 201501 - ( TB2-XML/JSON MIG : Fr/Nl are under construction... ) - (UN/Edifact & XML/JSON : added info ) |
Sender :
Receiver :
Status : 2 - Version : 3
|
Seq. n° | n u d (*) |
Data element | Code list |
Usage Mandatory Conditional Optional (**) |
Condition(s) |
TB2 XML and JSON representation (***) |
||
Indicator |
Identifier |
Version |
||||||
4 |
Garantie, type
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
Note this MCI is the one following MCI ICD6xx version 2
|
SubGuarantee...
|
|
5 |
Prime adaptable à l'évolution du risque
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
PremiumAdaptableToRiskEvolutionBinary
|
||
10 |
Prime unitaire
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
PremiumPerUnitAmount
|
||
15 |
Taux de prime
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
PremiumRatePercentage
|
(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.
(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.
Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard. And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used". Ideally we should implement the same ideas.
(***) Remark: In 2020 things evolved into another "approach A" and then yet another "approach B" - It is that "appoach B" which you see here - That "approach B" is the basis of the EDIMERX development.
In TB2-XML "Namespace 2018" (as well as in eEG7-UN/CEFACT), things were/are structurally different.
EDIMERX is supporting the transition from Edifact (messages) to JSON (API's).
The so-called "Business API's" are what comes next / after such transition-phase - and there things will be structurally differrent again.