> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details > Representations

SYNTAX INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS

Implementation Related Components


Message Content Inventory Identifier : EROD009 - Echange contextuel, données engin aérien - (Données engin aérien) - Approved , and is part of release 201801
- ( TB2-XML/JSON MIG : Fr/Nl are under construction... ) - (UN/Edifact & XML/JSON : added info )
Sender : Any
Receiver : Any
Status : 2 - Version : 1
Seq. n° n
u
d
(*)
Data element
Code list
Usage
Mandatory
Conditional
Optional (**)
Condition(s)
TB2 XML and JSON representation (***)
Indicator
Identifier
Version
10  
Contrat
No
-
-
Mand.
 
 
20  
Riskobject, type Engin aérien
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ObjectInsuredAircraft 
30  
Engin aérien - Marque et modèle
No
-
-
Mand.
 
MakeModelTypeName NameDetail LastName FirstName 
40  
Engin aérien - Marques d'identification
No
-
-
Cond.
pour tout engin immatriculé 
IdentificationMarkName NameDetail LastName 
50  
Engin aérien - Numéro de série de fabrication (n° chassis)
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ChassisReference 
60  
Engin aérien - Type d'engin aérien
Yes
1
Mand.
 
AircraftCode 
70  
Engin aérien - Classe d'utilisation du drone
Yes
1
Cond.
IF ATT+5900 = 06 Drone 
DroneUsageCategoryCode 
80  
Engin aérien - Masse maximale de décollage en kg
No
-
-
Mand.
 
MaximumTakeOffMassQuantity 

(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.

(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
  example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.

Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard. And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used". Ideally we should implement the same ideas.

(***) Remark: In 2020 things evolved into another "approach A" and then yet another "approach B" - It is that "appoach B" which you see here - That "approach B" is the basis of the EDIMERX development.
In TB2-XML "Namespace 2018" (as well as in eEG7-UN/CEFACT), things were/are structurally different.
EDIMERX is supporting the transition from Edifact (messages) to JSON (API's).
The so-called "Business API's" are what comes next / after such transition-phase - and there things will be structurally differrent again.