Message Content Inventory |
Archived, and was part of release 200701 : Identifier : ICD5xx - - (Données spécifiques des garanties Auto) - ( TB2-XML/JSON MIG : Fr/Nl are under construction... ) - (UN/Edifact & XML/JSON : added info ) |
Sender :
Receiver :
Status : 3 - Version : 2
|
Seq. n° | n u d (*) |
Data element | Code list |
Usage Mandatory Conditional Optional (**) |
Condition(s) |
TB2 XML and JSON representation (***) |
||
Indicator |
Identifier |
Version |
||||||
4 |
Garantie, type
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
Guarantee...
|
||
5 |
Degré bonus/malus d'application
|
Yes
|
2
|
Option.
|
ActualNoClaimsBonusLevelCode
|
|||
10 |
Degré bonus/malus de référence
|
Yes
|
2
|
Option.
|
ReferenceLevelForNoClaimsBonusCode
|
|||
15 |
Degré bonus/malus précédent
|
Yes
|
2
|
Option.
|
PreviousNoClaimsBonusLevelCode
|
|||
20 |
Classe de bonus/malus d'application
|
Yes
|
1
|
Option.
|
ActualNoClaimsBonusClassCode
|
|||
25 |
Classe de bonus/malus précédente
|
Yes
|
1
|
Option.
|
PreviousNoClaimsBonusClassCode
|
|||
30 |
Classe de bonus/malus de référence
|
Yes
|
1
|
Option.
|
ReferencedNoClaimsBonusClassCode
|
|||
35 | u |
Type de valeur couverte (véhicule)
|
Yes
|
4
|
Option.
|
ValueCoveredForMotorisedVehiclesCode
|
||
40 |
Type de franchise
|
Yes
|
1
|
Option.
|
ExemptionExpressedAsCode
|
|||
45 | u |
Franchise
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
ExemptionAmount
|
|
50 | u |
Coûts techniques
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
TechnicalExpensesAmount
|
|
55 | u |
Frais de commercialisation
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
CommercializationExpensesMotorLiabilityAmount
|
|
60 |
Pourcentage franchise ( sur valeur assurée )
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
FranchiseDeductableOnInsuredValuePercentage
|
||
65 |
Pourcentage réduction pour pluralité
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
ReducedPercentageForOtherInsurancePercentage
|
||
75 |
Sous-garanties
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
SubGuarantee...
|
(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.
(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.
Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard. And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used". Ideally we should implement the same ideas.
(***) Remark: In 2020 things evolved into another "approach A" and then yet another "approach B" - It is that "appoach B" which you see here - That "approach B" is the basis of the EDIMERX development.
In TB2-XML "Namespace 2018" (as well as in eEG7-UN/CEFACT), things were/are structurally different.
EDIMERX is supporting the transition from Edifact (messages) to JSON (API's).
The so-called "Business API's" are what comes next / after such transition-phase - and there things will be structurally differrent again.