> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details > Representations

SYNTAX INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS

Implementation Related Components


Message Content Inventory Identifier : M0104ANN - Contrat, avenant - (Avenant d'annulation) - Approved , and is part of release 202001
- ( TB2-XML/JSON MIG : Fr/Nl are under construction... ) - (UN/Edifact & XML/JSON : added info )
Sender : Insurer
Receiver : Broker
Status : 2 - Version : 5
Seq. n° n
u
d
(*)
Data element
Code list
Usage
Mandatory
Conditional
Optional (**)
Condition(s)
TB2 XML and JSON representation (***)
Indicator
Identifier
Version
10  
Message issuing date and time
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ExchangeUnitIssueDateTime 
20  
Message content inventory identifier
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ExchangeUnitBusinessContentDescription 
30 u 
Message content inventory version
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ExchangeUnitBusinessContentDescriptionVersion 
40  
Contrat
No
-
-
Mand.
 
 
41 n 
Contrat informatif - convention gestion flotte
Yes
1
Option.
absent defaults to - no - 
InformativeContractOnAgreementOnRisksAndGuaranteesManagementProcesscode 
50  
Nature du document
Yes
6
Mand.
Mandatory and with value 6 
MessageNatureProcesscode 
60  
Date d'annulation
No
-
-
Mand.
 
CancellationDate 
70  
Numéro de police
No
-
-
Mand.
 
PolicyReference 
80  
Numéro d'avenant
No
-
-
Mand.
 
EndorsementReference 
90  
GUID (Globally Unique IDentifier) du message, sera référencé par le(s) document(s) annexe(s)
No
-
-
Cond.
Mandatory when added documents are sent. 
MessageGuidReference 
100  
MOTIF d'annulation
Yes
4
Mand.
 
CancellationReasonCode 
110  
Origine de la résiliation
Yes
2
Option.
 
OriginForCancellationCode 
120  
Etat de l'acceptation de la nouvelle affaire ou du projet
Yes
2
Option.
 
StateOfAcceptanceCode 
130  
Nombre de documents annexes
No
-
-
Cond.
Mandatory when added documents are sent. 
DocumentsAttachedQuantity 
131 n 
Motif rédaction avenant
No
-
-
Option.
 
ndorsementGrantingMotiveText TextDetail FreeTextContent 
140  
Assureur
No
-
-
Mand.
 
PartyInsurer 
150  
Assureur - Numéro FSMA
No
-
-
Mand.
 
PartyIdentificationDetail PartyIdentifier CodeListIdentifier 
151  
Assureur - Numéro d'entreprise
No
-
-
Option.
 
CompanyNumberReference 
152  
Assureur - Numéro d'unité d'établissement
No
-
-
Option.
 
EstablishmentUnitNumberReference 
153  
Assureur - LEI
No
-
-
Option.
 
LegalEntityIdentifierReference 
160  
Intermédiaire
No
-
-
Mand.
 
PartyIntermediary 
170  
Intermédiaire - Numéro FSMA
No
-
-
Option.
Since 15/7/2017 the FSMA no longer attributes such number 
PartyIdentificationDetail PartyIdentifier CodeListIdentifier 
180  
Intermédiaire - Identifiant de l'intermédiaire aupres de la compagnie
No
-
-
Mand.
 
PartyIdentificationDetail PartyIdentifier CodeListIdentifier 
181  
Intermédiaire - Numéro d'entreprise
No
-
-
Option.
Added as FSMA-broker-id abandoned 15/7/2017 
CompanyNumberReference 
182  
Intermédiaire - Numéro unité d'exploitation
No
-
-
Option.
Added as FSMA-broker-id abandoned 15/7/2017 
EstablishmentUnitNumberReference 
183  
Intermédiaire - LEI
No
-
-
Option.
 
LegalEntityIdentifierReference 
190  
Intermédiaire - Référence police producteur
No
-
-
Option.
 
BrokerPolicyReference 
200  
Message end
No
-
-
Mand.
 
 

(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.

(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
  example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.

Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard. And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used". Ideally we should implement the same ideas.

(***) Remark: In 2020 things evolved into another "approach A" and then yet another "approach B" - It is that "appoach B" which you see here - That "approach B" is the basis of the EDIMERX development.
In TB2-XML "Namespace 2018" (as well as in eEG7-UN/CEFACT), things were/are structurally different.
EDIMERX is supporting the transition from Edifact (messages) to JSON (API's).
The so-called "Business API's" are what comes next / after such transition-phase - and there things will be structurally differrent again.