> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details > Representations

SYNTAX INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS

Implementation Related Components


Message Content Inventory Identifier : EROD003 - Echange contextuel, données engin nautique - (Données engin nautique) - Approved , and is part of release 202101
- ( TB2-XML/JSON MIG : Fr/Nl are under construction... ) - (UN/Edifact & XML/JSON : added info )
Sender : Any
Receiver : Any
Status : 2 - Version : 3
Seq. n° n
u
d
(*)
Data element
Code list
Usage
Mandatory
Conditional
Optional (**)
Condition(s)
TB2 XML and JSON representation (***)
Indicator
Identifier
Version
10  
Contrat
No
-
-
Mand.
 
 
20  
Riskobject, type
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ObjectInsuredVessel 
30  
Bateau, nom
No
-
-
Mand.
 
OfficialName NameDetail LastName 
40  
Bateau, marque
No
-
-
Option.
 
MakeModelTypeName NameDetail LastName 
50  
Bateau, marque et modèle
No
-
-
Option.
 
MakeModelTypeName NameDetail LastName FirstName 
60  
Bateau, pays de construction (code et nom)
No
-
-
Option.
 
ConstructionAddress CountryCoded CountryName 
70  
Bateau, année de construction
No
-
-
Option.
 
ProductionYear 
80  
Bateau, numéro d'identification de la coque
No
-
-
Option.
 
HullidentificationReference 
90  
Bateau, lettre de pavillon - code
No
-
-
Option.
 
CertificateOfColoursCodeReference 
100  
Bateau, lettre de pavillon - numéro
No
-
-
Option.
 
CertificateOfColoursNumberReference 
110  
Bateau, plaque d'immatriculation numéro
No
-
-
Option.
 
RegistrationPlateReference 
120  
Bateau, utilisation
Yes
1
Mand.
 
VesselUsageCode 
130  
Bateau, type
Yes
1
Option.
 
VesselCode 
140  
Bateau, gréement
Yes
1
Option.
 
RiggingCode 
150  
Bateau, matériaux de construction principal
Yes
1
Option.
 
VesselConstructionmaterialsCode 
151 n 
Bateau, a cabine
No
-
-
Option.
 
WithCabinBinary 
160  
Bateau, longueur hors tout en mètres
No
-
-
Option.
 
ShipTotalLenghtQuantity 
170  
Bateau, longueur de la coque en mètres
No
-
-
Option.
 
LengthQuantity 
180  
Bateau, largeur de la coque en mètres
No
-
-
Option.
 
WidthQuantity 
190  
Bateau, tirant d'eau en mètres
No
-
-
Option.
 
DraughtQuantity 
200  
Bateau - Certificat de navigation, nom
No
-
-
Option.
Multiple documents are a possibility 
DocumentCertificateOfNavigability 
210  
Bateau - Certificat de navigation, date de début de validité
No
-
-
Option.
 
ValidityStartDate 
220  
Bateau - Certificat de navigation, date de fin de validité
No
-
-
Option.
 
ExpirationDate 
230  
Bateau - Certificat de navigation, mediafile
No
-
-
Option.
 
...Datafile MultimediaDetail MultimediafileName MIMElikeContentTransferEncoding DatastringLength Datastring 
240  
Bateau - Port d'attache, nom
No
-
-
Option.
 
OfficialName NameDetail LastName 
250  
Bateau - Chantier de construction, nom
No
-
-
Option.
 
OfficialName NameDetail LastName 
260  
Garantie
No
-
-
Option.
0..n presencies 
Guarantee... 
270  
Bateau - Moteur, marque
No
-
-
Option.
0..n presencies - Multiple engines are a possibility 
MakeModelTypeName NameDetail LastName 
280  
Bateau - Moteur, marque et type
No
-
-
Option.
 
MakeModelTypeName NameDetail LastName FirstName 
290  
Bateau - Moteur, année de construction
No
-
-
Option.
 
ProductionYear 
300  
Bateau - Moteur, numéro de série
No
-
-
Option.
 
SerialNumberReference 
310  
Bateau - Moteur, installation
Yes
1
Option.
 
BoatMotorPlacementCode 
320  
Bateau - Moteur, carburant
Yes
1
Option.
 
BoatMotorFueltypeCode 
330  
Bateau - Moteur, description
No
-
-
Option.
 
DescriptionText 

(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.

(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
  example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.

Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard. And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used". Ideally we should implement the same ideas.

(***) Remark: In 2020 things evolved into another "approach A" and then yet another "approach B" - It is that "appoach B" which you see here - That "approach B" is the basis of the EDIMERX development.
In TB2-XML "Namespace 2018" (as well as in eEG7-UN/CEFACT), things were/are structurally different.
EDIMERX is supporting the transition from Edifact (messages) to JSON (API's).
The so-called "Business API's" are what comes next / after such transition-phase - and there things will be structurally differrent again.