> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details > Representations

SYNTAX INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS

Implementation Related Components


Message Content Inventory Identifier : EDOCxxx - Echange contextuel, document et ses meta-data - (Données document et Document / Document en zijn meta-data) - Approved , and is part of release 202301
- ( TB2-XML/JSON MIG : Fr/Nl are under construction... ) - (UN/Edifact & XML/JSON : added info )
Sender : Any
Receiver : Any
Status : 2 - Version : 2
Seq. n° n
u
d
(*)
Data element
Code list
Usage
Mandatory
Conditional
Optional (**)
Condition(s)
TB2 XML and JSON representation (***)
Indicator
Identifier
Version
10  
Document
No
-
-
Mand.
 
Document... 
20  
Document - Présence de fichier multimedia
Yes
1
Mand.
 
MultimediaFileIsPresentProcesscode 
30 u 
Document - Document à (faire) signer
Yes
3
Option.
 
DocumentToBeSignedProcesscode 
40 u 
Document - Signature digitale présente
Yes
3
Option.
 
DigitalSignaturePresentProcesscode 
50  
Document - Pérennité du URL
No
-
-
Cond.
FTX+063 présent et limité dans le temps 
UrlDurabilityDate 
60  
Document - Numéro du document
No
-
-
Option.
 
DocumentReference 
70  
Document - URL document
No
-
-
Cond.
GIS+EW12 = 2 Non 
UrlDocumentText 
80  
Document - Media représentant le document
No
-
-
Cond.
GIS+EW12 = 1 Oui 
...Datafile MultimediaDetail MultimediafileName MIMElikeContentTransferEncoding DatastringLength Datastring 

(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.

(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
  example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.

Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard. And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used". Ideally we should implement the same ideas.

(***) Remark: In 2020 things evolved into another "approach A" and then yet another "approach B" - It is that "appoach B" which you see here - That "approach B" is the basis of the EDIMERX development.
In TB2-XML "Namespace 2018" (as well as in eEG7-UN/CEFACT), things were/are structurally different.
EDIMERX is supporting the transition from Edifact (messages) to JSON (API's).
The so-called "Business API's" are what comes next / after such transition-phase - and there things will be structurally differrent again.