> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details > Representations

SYNTAX INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS

Implementation Related Components


Message Content Inventory Identifier : EVTROD01x - - (Evénement - objet de risque - données bâtiment) - Approved , and is part of release 201501
Sender : Any
Receiver : Any
Status : 2 - Version : 1
Seq. n° n
u
d
(*)
Data element
Code list
Usage
Mandatory
Conditional
Optional (**)
Condition(s)
TB2 UN/EDIFACT representation
TB2 XML and JSON representation (***)
Indicator
Identifier
Version
10  
Risk object - type : bâtiment
No
-
-
Mand.
01x 125 150 
ROD+010 
ObjectInsuredBuilding 
20  
Risk object bâtiment - Instance ID at insurer
No
-
-
Option.
 
ROD+010+x--x:002 
RiskObjectDetail ObjectIdentifier CodeListIdentifier 
30  
Risk object bâtiment - Instance ID at intermediary
No
-
-
Option.
 
ROD+010++x--x:003 
RiskObjectDetail ObjectIdentifier CodeListIdentifier 
40  
Risk object bâtiment - Situation du risque est adresse du preneur
Yes
1
Option.
 
ROD+010 - GIS+3011+x--x 
LocationIsPolicyHolderAddressProcesscode 
50  
Risk object bâtiment - Situation du risque
No
-
-
Option.
 
ROD+010 - ADR+001+x--x:x--x:x--x::x--x:x--x:x--x+x--x+x--x+x--x+x--x 
RiskAddress 
60  
Risk object bâtiment - Usage de l'immeuble
Yes
3
Option.
 
ROD+010 - ATT+3100+x--x 
BuildingUsageCode 
70  
Risk object bâtiment - Qualité du preneur d'assurance
Yes
5
Option.
 
ROD+010 - ATT+3110+x--x 
PolicyHolderCategoryCode 
80  
Risk object bâtiment - Description de l'usage du risque assuré
No
-
-
Option.
 
ROD+010 - FTX+008+x--x:x--x:x--x:x--x:x--x 
InsuredRiskUseDescriptionText 
90  
Risk object bâtiment - Créancier
No
-
-
Option.
 
ROD+010 - PTY+001 
PartyCreditor 
100  
Risk object bâtiment - Créancier - Identifiant chez l'assureur
No
-
-
Option.
 
ROD+010 - PTY+001+x--x:002 
PartyIdentificationDetail PartyIdentifier CodeListIdentifier 
110  
Risk object bâtiment - Créancier - Identifiant chez l'intermédiaire
No
-
-
Option.
 
ROD+010 - PTY+001++x--x:003 
PartyIdentificationDetail PartyIdentifier CodeListIdentifier 
120  
Risk object bâtiment - Créancier - Nom officiel
No
-
-
Mand.
 
ROD+010 - PTY+001 - NME+001+x--x::::x--x 
OfficialName NameDetail LastName NameExtension 
130  
Risk object bâtiment - Créancier - Type de créancier
Yes
1
Option.
 
ROD+010 - PTY+001 - ATT+3130+x--x 
CreditorCode 
140  
Risk object bâtiment - Guarantee
No
-
-
Mand.
Multiple presencies possible 
ROD+010 - ICD+xxx 
Guarantee... 
150  
Risk object bâtiment - Guarantee - Montant franchise
No
-
-
Option.
 
ROD+010 - ICD+xxx - MOA+033:9--9:EUR:2 
ExemptionAmount 
160  
Risk object bâtiment - Guarantee - Cover
No
-
-
Option.
Multiple presencies possible 
ROD+010 - ICD+xxx - IDD+xxx 
Cover... 
170  
Risk object bâtiment - Subobject - type : contenu
No
-
-
Option.
Multiple presencies possible 
ROD+010 - SRO+042 
SubobjectFurnitureAndEffects 
180  
Risk object bâtiment - Subobject contenu - Identifiant chez l'assureur / l'intermédiaire
No
-
-
Option.
 
ROD+010 - SRO+042+x--x:002/003 
RiskObjectDetail ObjectIdentifier CodeListIdentifier 
190  
Risk object bâtiment - Subobject contenu - Unité du capital
Yes
2
Option.
 
ROD+010 - SRO+042 - ATT+331N+x--x 
FurnitureCapitalUnitCode 
200  
Risk object bâtiment - Subobject contenu - Montant capital
No
-
-
Option.
 
ROD+010 - SRO+042 - MOA+004:9--9:EUR:2+x--x:x--x:x--x+x--x:x--x 
CapitalAmount 

(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.

(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
  example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.

Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard. And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used". Ideally we should implement the same ideas.

(***) Remark: In 2020 things evolved into another "approach A" and then yet another "approach B" - It is that "appoach B" which you see here - That "approach B" is the basis of the EDIMERX development.
In TB2-XML "Namespace 2018" (as well as in eEG7-UN/CEFACT), things were/are structurally different.
EDIMERX is supporting the transition from Edifact (messages) to JSON (API's).
The so-called "Business API's" are what comes next / after such transition-phase - and there things will be structurally differrent again.