SYNTAX INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS

MCI against derived EDI

Message Content Inventory (Full view) MCI-ID : 171
Identifier : M0104ANN
Version : 2

Object / Action : 1 / 4
(Contrat, avenant)

Domain : 0

View the Model-info in Fr, in Nl, or technically
Message (data) element
As from the Model
Description (Mandatory/Conditional/Optional) (Change)
Id
Level
Class
Generalization
Attribute and type
Codelist
Version
Message issuing date and time ( M ) (n)
10
       
 
Message content inventory identifier ( M ) (n)
11
       
 
Message content inventory version ( M ) (n)
12
       
 
Contrat ( O ) ()
20
       
 
Nature du document ( M ) ()
30
       
 
Date d'annulation ( M ) ()
40
       
 
Numéro de police ( M ) ()
50
       
 
Numéro d'avenant ( M ) ()
60
       
 
GUID (Globally Unique IDentifier) du message, sera référencé par le(s) document(s) annexe(s) ( O ) (n)
70
       
 
Motif d'annulation ( M ) (u)
80
       
 
Origine de la résiliation ( O ) ()
90
       
 
Etat de l'acceptation de la nouvelle affaire ou du projet ( O ) ()
100
       
 
Assureur ( M ) (u)
110
       
 
Assureur - Numéro CBFA ( M ) ()
120
       
 
Intermédiaire ( M ) (u)
130
       
 
Intermédiaire - Numéro CBFA ( O ) ()
140
       
 
Intermédiaire - Identifiant de l'intermédiaire aupres de la compagnie ( M ) ()
150
       
 
Intermédiaire - Référence producteur ( M ) (u)
160
       
 
How you should read this table:
- Everything is on one line, and the "Generalization" field is empty: the "Attribute" belongs to the mentioned "Class".
- Everything is on one line, and the "Generalization" field is filled: the "Attribute" belongs to the mentioned "Generalization" of such "Class".
  This "Generalization" is not necessarily the one directly above the "Class", as there can be multiple "layers" of sucessive "Generalizations".
- One "Message (data) element" with it's "Id" has multiple "As from the Model" counterparts with "Level" 0, 1, ...
  The "Attribute" does not belong to the "Class" or "Generalization" in itself, but to some associated "Class" of "Generalization".
  Note that an association can be seen from "Class" to "Class", but also from "Class"-"Generalization" to "Class".