SYNTAX INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS

MCI against derived EDI
Message Content Inventory (Full view) MCI-ID : 78
Identifier : M0306
Version : 1

Object / Action : 3 / 6
(Quittance, avis de retard de payement)
Domain : 0
View the Model-info in Fr, in Nl, or technically
Message (data) element
As from the Model
Description (Mandatory/Conditional/Optional) (Change)
Id
Level
Class
Generalization
Attribute and type
Codelist
Version
Date de comptabilisation ( O ) ()
5
       
 
Date de début de période ( O ) ()
6
       
 
Numéro de la quittance ( compagnie ) ( O Si présent, numéro unique / Indien aanwezig, een uniek nummer) ()
9
       
 
Numéro de police ( O ) ()
10
       
 
Statut de recouvrement ( de la quittance ) ( O ) ()
40
       
 
Total à payer ( O ) ()
50
       
 
Commission ( O ) ()
60
       
 
Frais de recouvrement ( O ) ()
90
       
 
Acompte ( O ) ()
100
       
 
Intermédiaire ( O ) ()
219
       
 
Intermédiaire - Identifiant de l'intermédiaire aupres de la compagnie ( O ) ()
220
       
 
Intermédiaire - Code carte d'échange ( O ) ()
230
       
 
Intermédiaire - Référence producteur ( O ) ()
240
       
 
Preneur d'assurance ( O ) ()
329
       
 
Preneur d'assurance - Nom officiel ( O ) ()
330
       
 
Assureur ( O ) ()
340
       
 
Assureur - Numéro CBFA ( O ) ()
350
       
 
Assureur - Code carte d'échange ( O ) ()
360
       
 
How you should read this table:
- Everything is on one line, and the "Generalization" field is empty: the "Attribute" belongs to the mentioned "Class".
- Everything is on one line, and the "Generalization" field is filled: the "Attribute" belongs to the mentioned "Generalization" of such "Class".
  This "Generalization" is not necessarily the one directly above the "Class", as there can be multiple "layers" of sucessive "Generalizations".
- One "Message (data) element" with it's "Id" has multiple "As from the Model" counterparts with "Level" 0, 1, ...
  The "Attribute" does not belong to the "Class" or "Generalization" in itself, but to some associated "Class" of "Generalization".
  Note that an association can be seen from "Class" to "Class", but also from "Class"-"Generalization" to "Class".