> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details
|
Message Content Inventory |
Archived, and was part of release 201501 : Identifier : M0108 - Contrat, avenant - (Avis au producteur dépossédé)- - ( UN/Edifact : added info ) - (UN/Edifact MIG : Fr / Nl ) - (XML/JSON : added info ) ( Additional information is present below the details-table ) |
Sender : Insurer
Receiver : Broker
Status : 3 - Version : 1
|
Seq. n° | n u d (*) |
Data element | Code list |
Usage Mandatory Conditional Optional (**) |
Condition(s) |
||
Indicator |
Identifier |
Version |
|||||
10 |
Message issuing date and time
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
20 |
Message content inventory identifier
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
30 |
Message content inventory version
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
40 |
Contrat
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
50 | u |
Nature du document
|
Yes
|
5
|
Mand.
|
Mandatory and with value 15
|
|
60 |
Date de résiliation
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
70 |
Numéro de police
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
80 |
Numéro d'avenant
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
90 |
GUID (Globally Unique IDentifier) du message, sera référencé par le(s) document(s) annexe(s)
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Cond.
|
Mandatory when added documents are sent.
|
|
100 |
Origine de la résiliation
|
Yes
|
1
|
Mand.
|
|||
110 |
Nombre de documents annexes
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Cond.
|
Mandatory when added documents are sent.
|
|
120 |
Assureur
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
130 | u |
Assureur - Numéro CBFA
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
|
140 |
Intermédiaire
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
Watch out: this is the broker who lost the mandate
|
|
150 | u |
Intermédiaire - Numéro CBFA
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
|
160 | u |
Intermédiaire - Identifiant de l'intermédiaire aupres de la compagnie
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
|
170 |
Intermédiaire - Référence police producteur
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
Watch out: this is the one of the broker who lost the mandate
|
(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.
(*bis) u : updated : this can be a codelist-version incrementing.
Note that in many, not to say all such cases, the user-community does not await such next release to implement/activate such new codelist-values.
The reasoning is that such added value does not affect the current data-structures and hence is considered easely implementable.
Such reasoning tends to forget how given new codelist-values might not simply affect the data, but also affect the process, which might be more of a problem...
(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.
Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard.
And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used".
Ideally we should implement the same ideas.