> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details

SYNTAX INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS

Implementation Related Components


Message Content Inventory Archived, and was part of release 201501 :
Identifier : M0108 - Contrat, avenant - (Avis au producteur dépossédé)-
- ( UN/Edifact : added info )
- (UN/Edifact MIG : Fr / Nl ) - (XML/JSON : added info )
( Additional information is present below the details-table )
Sender : Insurer
Receiver : Broker
Status : 3 - Version : 1
Seq. n° n
u
d
(*)
Data element
Code list
Usage
Mandatory
Conditional
Optional (**)
Condition(s)
Indicator
Identifier
Version
10  
Message issuing date and time
No
-
-
Mand.
 
20  
Message content inventory identifier
No
-
-
Mand.
 
30  
Message content inventory version
No
-
-
Mand.
 
40  
Contrat
No
-
-
Mand.
 
50 u 
Nature du document
Yes
5
Mand.
Mandatory and with value 15 
60  
Date de résiliation
No
-
-
Mand.
 
70  
Numéro de police
No
-
-
Mand.
 
80  
Numéro d'avenant
No
-
-
Mand.
 
90  
GUID (Globally Unique IDentifier) du message, sera référencé par le(s) document(s) annexe(s)
No
-
-
Cond.
Mandatory when added documents are sent. 
100  
Origine de la résiliation
Yes
1
Mand.
 
110  
Nombre de documents annexes
No
-
-
Cond.
Mandatory when added documents are sent. 
120  
Assureur
No
-
-
Mand.
 
130 u 
Assureur - Numéro CBFA
No
-
-
Mand.
 
140  
Intermédiaire
No
-
-
Mand.
Watch out: this is the broker who lost the mandate 
150 u 
Intermédiaire - Numéro CBFA
No
-
-
Option.
 
160 u 
Intermédiaire - Identifiant de l'intermédiaire aupres de la compagnie
No
-
-
Mand.
 
170  
Intermédiaire - Référence police producteur
No
-
-
Mand.
Watch out: this is the one of the broker who lost the mandate 

(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.

(*bis) u : updated : this can be a codelist-version incrementing.
  Note that in many, not to say all such cases, the user-community does not await such next release to implement/activate such new codelist-values.
  The reasoning is that such added value does not affect the current data-structures and hence is considered easely implementable.
  Such reasoning tends to forget how given new codelist-values might not simply affect the data, but also affect the process, which might be more of a problem...

(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
  example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.

Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard.
  And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used".
  Ideally we should implement the same ideas.



Added information :

Voir dans les BBP le point 15B. ( Suivre >Models >Broker Business Processes >Next->... jusqu'à ce point 15B)
/ Zie in de BBP het punt 15B. ( Volg >Models >Broker Business Processes >Next->... tot aan dat punt 15B)
( https://www.telebib2.org/ProcessBB15B.htm )