> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details
SYNTAX INDEPENDENT
COMPONENTS
Implementation Related Components
|
> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details
|
SYNTAX INDEPENDENT
COMPONENTS |
|
| Message Content Inventory |
Identifier : M0105 - Contrat, modification administrative - (Message générique)-
- Approved
, and is part of release 201701
- ( UN/Edifact : added info ) - (UN/Edifact MIG : Fr / Nl ) - (XML/JSON : added info ) ( Additional information is present below the details-table ) |
Sender : Broker
Receiver : Insurer
Status : 2 - Version : 3
|
| Seq. n° | n u d (*) |
Data element | Code list |
Usage Mandatory Conditional Optional (**) |
Condition(s) |
||
Indicator |
Identifier |
Version |
|||||
| 10 |
Message issuing date and time
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
| 11 |
Message content inventory identifier
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
| 12 | u |
Message content inventory version
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
|
| 20 |
Numéro de police
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
| 30 |
GUID (Globally Unique IDentifier) du message, sera référencé par le(s) document(s) annexe(s)
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Cond.
|
Mandatory when added documents are sent.
|
|
| 40 |
Nombre de documents annexes
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Cond.
|
Mandatory when added documents are sent.
|
|
| 50 |
Encaissement de la police - le terme
|
Yes
|
1
|
Option.
|
|||
| 60 |
Encaissement de la police - le comptant
|
Yes
|
1
|
Option.
|
|||
| 70 |
Encaissement de la police - le terme - les échéances intermédiaires
|
Yes
|
1
|
Option.
|
|||
| 80 |
Mode d'encaissement vis-à-vis client
|
Yes
|
3
|
Option.
|
|||
| 90 |
Intermédiaire
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
| 100 |
Intermédiaire - Numéro FSMA
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
Since 15/7/2017 the FSMA no longer attributes such number
|
|
| 110 |
Intermédiaire - Identifiant de l'intermédiaire aupres de la compagnie
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
| 120 |
Intermédiaire - Référence police producteur
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
| 121 | n |
Intermédiaire - Numéro d'entreprise
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
Added as FSMA-broker-id abandoned 15/7/2017
|
| 122 | n |
Intermédiaire - Numéro unité d'établissement
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
Added as FSMA-broker-id abandoned 15/7/2017
|
| 130 |
Preneur d'assurance
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
||
| 140 |
Référence police preneur
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
||
| 150 |
Preneur d'assurance - Numéro du compte financier
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
||
| 160 |
Preneur d'assurance - Code BIC
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
||
| 170 |
Preneur d'assurance - Numéro IBAN
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
||
(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.
(*bis) u : updated : this can be a codelist-version incrementing.
Note that in many, not to say all such cases, the user-community does not await such next release to implement/activate such new codelist-values.
The reasoning is that such added value does not affect the current data-structures and hence is considered easely implementable.
Such reasoning tends to forget how given new codelist-values might not simply affect the data, but also affect the process, which might be more of a problem...
(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.
Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard.
And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used".
Ideally we should implement the same ideas.